Editorial Policies

Focus and Scope

Prosiding JESICA provides a forum to promote the wide dissemination of knowledge and research. This proceeding encompasses research articles and conceptual papers in the areas: 

  1. Management
  2. Accounting
  3. Economic development
  4. Sharia Economics
  5. Entrepreneurship
  6. Islamic Accounting and Finance
  7. Halal Economy/Industry
Management accountancy Economic development Sharia Economics Entrepreneurship Islamic Accounting and Finance Halal Economy/Industry

 

Section Policies

Articles

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed
 

Peer Review Process

The practice of peer review is intended to ensure that only good science is published. As an objective method of guaranteeing excellence in scholarly publishing, it has been adopted by all reputable scientific journals. Our reviewers play a vital role in maintaining the standards of the Proceeding of Jakarta Economic Sustainability International Conference Agenda

Initial manuscript evaluation
The editors first evaluate all submitted manuscripts. It is rare, but it is possible for an exceptional manuscript to be accepted at this stage. Manuscripts rejected at this stage are insufficiently original, have serious scientific flaws, or are outside the aims and scope of the journal. Those that meet the minimum criteria are normally passed on to at least two expert reviewers for review.

Authors of manuscripts rejected at this stage will usually be informed within three weeks of receipt.

Type of peer review
The Proceeding of Jakarta Economic Sustainability International Conference Agenda employs double blind review, in which the reviewers remain anonymous to the author(s) throughout and following the reviewing process. At the same time of reviewing process the authors also remain anonymous. 

How the reviewer is selected
Whenever possible, reviewers are matched to the paper according to their expertise. 

Referee reports
Reviewers are asked to evaluate whether the manuscript:

  • Is original as to thought and method (including data)
  • Is methodologically sound
  • Has results that are clearly presented and support the conclusions
  • Correctly and exhaustively references previous relevant work
  • Follows appropriate ethical guidelines, especially as concerns plagiarism
  • Clearly adds to the knowledge and development of the field

How long does the review process take?
The time required for the review process is dependent on the response of the referees. For the Proceeding of Jakarta Economic Sustainability International Conference Agenda, the typical time for the first round of the review process is approximately 6 weeks, with a maximum of four months. 

Final report
A final decision to accept or reject the manuscript will be sent to the author along with the recommendations made by the reviewers, including (if applicable) the latter’s verbatim comments.

The Editor in Chief's decision is final
Reviewers advise the Editor in Chief, who is responsible for the final decision to accept or reject the article.

Proceeding of Jakarta Economic Sustainability International Conference Agenda

 

Publication Frequency

This proceeding is published annually in January

 

Open Access Policy

This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.

 

Archiving

This journal utilizes the LOCKSS system to create a distributed archiving system among participating libraries and permits those libraries to create permanent archives of the journal for purposes of preservation and restoration. More...