- Fokus dan Ruang Lingkup
- Kebijakan Bagian
- Proses Peer Review
- Frekuensi Penerbitan
- Kebijakan Akses Terbuka
- Pengarsipan
Fokus dan Ruang Lingkup
Prosiding BIEMA memuat dan mempublikasikan artikel dalam ruang lingkup Manajemen, Bisnis, Akuntansi, Keuangan, dan Ilmu Ekonomi, yang meliputi:
- Manajemen
- Akuntansi
- Ekonomi Pembangunan
- Ekonomi Syariah
- Kewirausahaan
- Akuntansi dan Keuangan Syariah
- Ekonomi/Industri Halal
Kebijakan Bagian
Articles
Naskah Terbuka | Diindeks | Telah di-Peer review |
Proses Peer Review
The practice of peer review is intended to ensure that only good science is published. As an objective method of guaranteeing excellence in scholarly publishing, it has been adopted by all reputable scientific journals. Our reviewers play a vital role in maintaining the standards of the Journal of Islamic Economics and Finance Studies.
Initial manuscript evaluation
The editors first evaluate all submitted manuscripts. It is rare, but it is possible for an exceptional manuscript to be accepted at this stage. Manuscripts rejected at this stage are insufficiently original, have serious scientific flaws, or are outside the aims and scope of the journal. Those that meet the minimum criteria are normally passed on to at least two expert reviewers for review.
Authors of manuscripts rejected at this stage will usually be informed within three weeks of receipt.
Type of peer review
The Journal of Islamic Economics and Finance Studies employs ‘double-blind’ reviewing, in which the reviewers remain anonymous to the author(s) throughout and following the reviewing process, whilst the identity of the author(s) is likewise unknown to the reviewers.
How the reviewer is selected
Whenever possible, reviewers are matched to the paper according to their expertise.
Referee reports
Reviewers are asked to evaluate whether the manuscript:
- Is original as to thought and method (including data)
- Is methodologically sound
- Has results which are clearly presented and support the conclusions
- Correctly and exhaustively references previous relevant work
- Follows appropriate ethical guidelines, especially as concerns plagiarism
- Clearly adds to the knowledge and development of the field
How long does the review process take?
The time required for the review process is dependent on the response of the referees. For the Journal of Islamic Economics and Finance Studies, the typical time for the first round of the review process is approximately 6 weeks, with a maximum of three months.
Final report
A final decision to accept or reject the manuscript will be sent to the author along with the recommendations made by the reviewers, including (if applicable) the latter’s verbatim comments.
The Editor in Chief's decision is final
Reviewers advise the Editor in Chief, who is responsible for the final decision to accept or reject the article.
Frekuensi Penerbitan
This proceeding is published annually in October
Kebijakan Akses Terbuka
This proceeding provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.
Pengarsipan
This journal utilizes the LOCKSS system to create a distributed archiving system among participating libraries and permits those libraries to create permanent archives of the journal for purposes of preservation and restoration. More...