Pengaruh Fraud Pentagon terhadap Fraudulent Financial Reporting
Abstract
This study is a quantitative method research which aims to analyze the influence of the fraud pentagon on the possibility of fraudulent financial reporting. Pentagon fraud theory is stretched by pressure (financial target), opportunity (ineffective monitoring), rationalization (change in auditor), competence (change of director), arrogance (frequent number of CEO’s picture). The method used to collect samples is purposive sampling. The sample consisted of 26 companies from 55 manufacturing companies in the consumer goods sector which were study population in 2015-2019. This study uses secondary data as the source of the data studied, namely data obtained from magazines, notes, and books in the form of financial reports or annual reports published by companies, government reports, articles and/or others. This research uses logistic regression analysis method with a significance level below 5%. This study provides the results that the financial target, ineffective monitoring, change in auditor, change of director, and frequent number of CEO’s picture have no effect toward fraudulent financial reporting. It’s because the level of significance obtained is higher than 5%.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Aprilia, A. (2017). Analisis Pengaruh Fraud Pentagon Terhadap Kecurangan Laporan Keuangan Menggunakan Beneish Model Pada Perusahaan Yang Menerapkan Asean Corporate Governance Scorecard, Jurnal ASET (Akuntansi Riset), 9(1), 101. https://doi.org/10.17509/jaset.v9i1.5259
Association of Certified Fraud Examiners. (2018). Global Study on Occupational Fraud and Abuse, Report to the Nations, 10(80).
Dalnial, H., Kamaluddin, A., Sanusi, Z. M., and Khairuddin, K. S. (2014). Detecting Fraudulent Financial Reporting through Financial Statement Analysis, Journal of Advanced Management Science, 2(1).
Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Agency Theory: An Assessment And Review. Academy of Management Review. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1989.4279003
Faradiza, S. A. (2018). Fraud Pentagon Dan Kecurangan Laporan Keuangan, Jurnal Ekonomi Dan Bisnis, Volume II, No. 1. Finance, Detik, 2004.
Ghozali, I. (2018). Aplikasi Analisis Multivariate Dengan Program IBM SPSS 25, (Edisi 9, Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro, Semarang.
Horwath, C. (2011). Why the Fraud Triangle is No Longer Enough, from Www.Crowe.Com.
Ichsan, R. (2013). Teori Keagenan (Agency Theory), from https://bungrandhy.wordpress.com/2013/01/12/teori-keagenan-agencytheory
Jaunanda, M., Tian, C., Edita, K., and Vivien. (2020). Analisis Pengaruh Fraud Pentagon Terhadap Fraudulent Financial Reporting Menggunakan Beneish Model, Jurnal Penelitian Akuntansi, Volume I, hlm. 80–98.
Kabila, F. F. B., and Suryani, E. (2019). Pengaruh Financial Target, Nature Of Industry, Opini Audit Dan Pergantian Direksi Terhadap Kecurangan Laporan Keuangan Pada Perusahaan Perbankan Yang Terdaftar Di Bursa Efek Indonesia Tahun 2015-2017, eProceedings of Management, Volume VI.
Karyono. (2013). Forensic Fraud, CV. Andi, Yogyakarta.
Kayoi, S. A., and Fuad, F. (2019). Faktor-faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Financial Statement Fraud Ditinjau Dari Fraud Triangle pada Perusahaan Manufaktur Di Bursa Efek Indonesia Periode 2015-2017, Diponegoro Journal of Accounting, Volume, VIII.
Santoso. (2019). Fenomena Kecurangan Laporan Keuangan Pada Perusahaan Terbuka Di Indonesia, Jurnal Magister Akuntansi Trisakti, Volume VI, hlm. 173–200. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.25105/jmat.v6i2.5556
Sasongko, N., and Wijayantika, S. F. (2019). Faktor Resiko Fraud Terhadap Pelaksanaan Fraudulent Financial Reporting (Berdasarkan Pendekatan Crown’S Fraud Pentagon Theory), Riset Akuntansi Dan Keuangan Indonesia, Volume IV, hlm. 67–76. https://doi.org/10.23917/reaksi.v4i1.7809
Satwika, A., and Damayanti, T. W. (2005). Deteksi Manajemen Laba melalui Beban Pajak Tangguhan, Jurnal Ekonomi dan Bisnis, Volume XI, hlm. 101-118.
Sihombing, K. S., and Rahardjo, S. N. (2014). Pengaruh Fraud Diamond dalam Mendeteksi Financial Statement Fraud (Studi Empiris pada Perusahaan Ritel yang Terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia Tahun 2014–2016), Diponegoro Journal of Accounting, Volume III, hlm. 1–12.
Simanjuntak, R. (2008). Pengertian dan Pencegahan Kecurangan. Seri Departemen Akuntansi: FEUI.
Skousen, C. J., and Twedt, B. J. (2009). Fraud Score Analysis In Emerging Markets. Cross Cultural Management, An International Journal. https://doi.org/10.1108/13527600910977373
Sudana, I. M., and Aristina, N. P. N. (2017). Chief Executive Officer (Ceo) Power, Ceo Keluarga, Dan Nilai Ipo Premium Perusahaan Keluarga Di Indonesia, Jurnal Akuntansi, Volume XXII, hlm. 219.
Sugiyono. (2015). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan (Pendekatan Kuantitatif,. Kualitatif dan R&D), CV. Alfabeta, Bandung.
Sugiyono. (2017). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan R&D, PT Alfabet, Bandung. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004
Ulfah, M., Nuraina, E., and Wijaya, A. L. (2017). Pengaruh Fraud Pentagon Dalam Mendeteksi Fraudulent Financial Reporting (Studi Empiris Pada Perbankan di Indonesia Yang Terdaftar di BEI), Forum Ilmiah Pendidikan Akuntansi, Volume V, hlm. 399–417.
Wild, J. J., and Subramanyam, K. R. (2010). Analisis Laporan Keuangan, Financial Statement Analysis. Analisis Laporan Keuangan, Financial Statement Analysis (Ed. 10), Salemba Empat, Jakarta.
Wolfe, B. D. T., and Hermanson, D. R. (2014). Print The Fraud Diamond. Considering the Four Elements of Fraud, Volume XII (Exhibit 1), hlm. 1–5.
Wolfe, D. T., and Hermanson, D. R. (2004). The Fraud Diamond: Considering the Four Elements of Fraud, CPA Journal.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2021 Konferensi Riset Nasional Manajemen Akuntansi dan Ekonomi
Diterbitkan oleh:
Fakultas Ekonomi dan Bisnis, Universitas Pembangunan Nasional Veteran Jakarta
Jl. RS Fatmawati No. 1, Pondok Labu, Jakarta Selatan, Indonesia 12450
Prosiding BIEMA is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.