Industry 5.0 and Legal Reasoning Reconstruction

Isman -

Abstract


The main feature to be found in this study is a legal reasoning concept that is consistent with the 5.0 society that highly integrates cyberspace and physical space based on the princinple of Pancasila. The legal framework of positivism, in response to the legal vacuum and interactions of society 5.0, shows a lot of stagnation. This research used a case-based approach that examines the legal reasoning of judges for resolution of commercial disputes. Data used in this study were collected from secondary data, the Landmark decision of the Supreme Court in commercial disputes from 2017 to 2019 and academic studies of legal sciences.  The findings of the study indicated fourth conclusions. First, The New legal paradigm in 5.0 society should break away from the conventional models where the legal structure plays a major role. Secondly, the value of the Pancasila judicial system requires a balance between deontic reasoning models and market-based models. Thirdly, on the capacity of legal subjects, the Supreme Court focused on the conventional governance with the concept of the deontic reasoning model. Fourthly, according to unfair business competition the Supreme Court used market-based approaches, this indicates that the 5.0 attributes have started to adopt in judicial reasoning system.


Keywords


Industry 5.0, Legal Reasoning, Reconstruction

Full Text:

PDF

References


Anderson, B. (1996). Legal Reasoning in A New Context. “Discovery” in Legal Decision-Making Law and Philosophy Library, 143-170. doi:10.1007/978-94-017-0554-7_8

Badan Pusat Statistik, (. (2019). Statistik E-Commerce Indonesiat tahun 2019. Jakarta, Indonesia: Badan Pusat Statistik R.I.

Budiman, A. (2019, February 11). Industri 4.0 vs Society 5.0. Retrieved November 10, 2020, from https://ft.ugm.ac.id/kolom-pakar-industri-4-0-vs-society-5-0/

Dimiškovska, A. (2013). (Dia)logical Reconstruction of Legal Justification. Retrieved November 12, 2020, from https://journals.openedition.org/revus/pdf/2463

Dimiškovska, A. (2013). (Dia)logical Reconstruction of Legal Justification. Revus, (19), 155-178. doi:10.4000/revus.2463.

The European Economic and Social Committee, (. (2019, May 07). Industry 5.0 will bring about a new paradigm of cooperation between humans and machines. Retrieved November 10, 2020, from https://www.eesc.europa.eu/en/news-media/news/industry-50-will-bring-about-new-paradigm-cooperation-between-humans-and-machines.

Gladden, M. E. (2019). Who Will Be the Members of Society 5.0? Towards an Anthropology of Technologically Posthumanized Future Societies. Social Sciences, 8(5), 148. doi:10.3390/socsci8050148.

Hafner, C. (2001). Legal Reasoning. Retrieved November 11, 2020, from https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/computer-science/legal-reasoning.

Hafner, C. (2001). Legal Reasoning. Retrieved November 12, 2020, from https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/computer-science/legal-reasoning.

Husa, A., & Husa, J. (2014, September 2). Law and Context. Retrieved November 12, 2020, from http://paulscholten.eu/research/article/law-and-context/.

Keraf, A. S., & Dua, M. (2001). Ilmu pengetahuan: Sebuah tinjauan filosofis. Yogyakarta: Penerbit Kanisius.

Kordig, C. R. (1978). Discovery and Justification. Philosophy of Science, 45(1), 110-117. doi:10.1086/288782.

Lopez Jiménez, D. (2016). The Self-Regulation of Electronic Commerce: An Appraisal in Accordance to the Chilean Law of Unfair Competition. Retrieved November 12, 2020, from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/306147774_The_Self-Regulation_of_Electronic_Commerce_An_Appraisal_in_Accordance_to_the_Chilean_Law_of_Unfair_Competition.

Mahkamah Agung R.I, M. (2017). Landmark Decision 2017 - Mahkamah Agung. Retrieved November 12, 2020, from https://bldk.mahkamahagung.go.id/puslitbang-hukum-dan-peradilan/landmark-decisions/item/112-landmark-decision-2017.

Mahkamah Agung R.I, M. (2019). Landmark Decision 2019 Perdata EN - bldk.mahkamahagung.go.id. Retrieved November 12, 2020, from https://bldk.mahkamahagung.go.id/id/component/k2/item/128-landmark-decision-2019-perdata-en.

Medina-Borja Alexandra. (2017). Future Services & Societal Systems in Society 5.0. In Future Services & Societal Systems in Society 5.0. (pp. 39-235). Japan, Japan: Japan Science and Technology Agency.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Diterbitkan Oleh :

Faculty of Law

UPN Veteran Jakarta

Jl. RS. Fatmawati Raya, Pd. Labu, Kec. Cilandak,

Jakarta Selatan, DKI Jakarta 12450.

Fax : 021-7656971/021-7699431

Telp : 021-7656971 Ext.139/193

Email : fh_conf@upnvj.ac.id

Website : fh@upnvj.ac.id

Prosiding BIEMA is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.